Article | De Ethica. A Journal of Philosophical, Theological and Applied Ethics | Transworld Egoism, Empathy, and the Golden Rule
De Ethica
A Journal of
Philosophical,
Theological and
Applied Ethics

Title:
Transworld Egoism, Empathy, and the Golden Rule
Author:
Harriet E. Baber: University of San Diego, USA
DOI:
10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.163321
Read article:
Full article (pdf)
Abstract:
According to preferentism, the ‘desire theory’ of well-being, one is made better off to the extent that her preferences, or desires, are satisfied. According to narrow preferentism, preferentism as it has traditionally been understood, the preferences that matter in this regard are just actual preferences; preferences we might ‘easily have had’, do not matter. On this account also, only actual preference satisfaction contributes to well-being. Merely possible preference satisfaction, including the ‘real possibility’ of attaining desired states of affairs, does not contribute to well-being. Broad preferentism makes sense of the intuition that feasibility as such contributes to well-being. On this account, we are made better off not only by the actual satisfaction of our actual preferences but also by the mere feasibility of satisfying preferences that we ‘might easily have had’. In addition to making sense of our intuition that feasibility as such, contributes to our well-being, broad preferentism provides a rationale for altruistic behavior. On this account support policies that benefit worldmates whose actual circumstances are different from our own because their circumstances are the our circumstances at nearby possible worlds, and our circumstances at other possible worlds, affect our own actual well-being.
Keywords:
Not available
Year:
2016
Volume:
3
Issue:
3
Pages:
21-31
No. of pages:
11
Publication type:
Article
Published:
2017-02-02

Volume 3, Issue: 3, Article 4, 2016

Author:
Harriet E. Baber
Title:
Transworld Egoism, Empathy, and the Golden Rule:
DOI:
10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.163321
References:

Baber, Harriet. E. ‘Ex Ante Desire and Post Hoc Satisfaction’, in Time and Identity: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 7., edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael ORourke, and Harry S. Silverstein. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2008, pp. 249-267.

Baber, Harriet. E. ‘Worlds, Capabilities and Well-Being’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13:4 (2010), pp. 377-392. DOI: 10.1007/s10677-009-9207-1

Bureau of Labor Stastics. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2010.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010-11 Edition. United States Department of Labor. Washington, DC: United States Government, 2010.

‘”Continued Employment after the War?”: The Women’s Bureau Studies Postwar Plans of Women Workers’, online at http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/7027/ (accessed 2017-01-03).

Guo, Jeff. ‘Donald Trump didn’t ‘hoodwink’ his voters, says professor who has spent nearly a decade researching them’, Washington Post, November 15 (2016). Online at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/15/donald-trumpdidnt-hoodwink-his-voters-says-professor-whos-spent-nearly-a-decade-researchingthem/?utm_term=.f197c7d23113 (accessed 2017-01-03).

Hegewisch, Ariane, Hannah Liepmann, Jeff Hayes, and Heidi Hartmann. Separate and Not Equal? Gender Segregation in the Labor Market and the Gender Wage Gap. Washington, DC: Institute for Womens Policy Research, 2010. DOI: 10.1037/e686432011-001

Prinz, Jesse. J. ‘Is Empathy Necessary for Morality?’, in Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, edited by Peter Goldie and Amy Coplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011, pp. 211-229. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0014

Sen, Amartya. ‘Capability and Well-being’, in The Quality of Life, edited by Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, pp. 30-53. DOI: 10.1093/0198287976.003.0003


Volume 3, Issue: 3, Article 4, 2016

Author:
Harriet E. Baber
Title:
Transworld Egoism, Empathy, and the Golden Rule:
DOI:
10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.163321
Note: the following are taken directly from CrossRef
Citations:
No citations available at the moment